Category Archives: Uncategorized

SUNY Buffalo Law Offering 2-Year J.D. for Foreign Lawyers

From the New York Law Journal:

Lawyers who hold law degrees from institutions outside the United States will be able to earn a J.D. in two years through an accelerated degree program at University at Buffalo Law School set to begin this fall.

The degree is part of a wider push by Buffalo Law to establish itself as an internationally known institution and to train lawyers from all over the world. Unlike students completing their LL.M., a one-year masters program, J.D. candidates in the two-year program will be part of the school’s traditional J.D. class. Their degrees from foreign institutions will give them advanced standing at Buffalo Law as if they’ve completed about 30 credit hours, or one year of law school.

“If you’re looking at this as an 18-year-old in another country, you think, ‘I can be a lawyer in my country and a New York lawyer.’ It’s a big value proposition,” said David Westbrook, a Buffalo Law professor and director of the school’s global strategic initiative. “You can hold yourself out to multinational corporations and say not only are you familiar with local laws, but you’re familiar with the law of the deals.”

The state Court of Appeals and the American Bar Association have both approved the accelerated J.D. Buffalo Law is one of the first in the nation—and the first in New York—to offer this kind of program.

More information is available here.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

On law schools and institutional crisis

Bill Henderson has previously said that he expects big layoffs at law schools this fall – presumably thinking that there will be a huge overall revenue shortfall, but that schools won’t know, until opening day, just how bad their own situations look. We will soon be able to test Bill’s crystal ball. But the Catholic University story should wake up a much wider swath of academics to the impact of the current law school crisis. At universities highly dependent on law school revenue – apparently, Catholic U is among those schools – the crisis will eat directly into the budgets of other programs. But where law schools are break-even propositions – the many law schools where overhead covers just that – the reality that law schools actually need institutional subsidies (just like almost every other college in a larger school) may mean that the universities may more critically question the need for a law school…and may empower the university to impose its will and priorities on law schools that were previously very independent.

Dan Filler

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Logic

What Dan Filler at The Faculty Lounge wrote:

The newest voume summary from LSAC is out and it indicates that, as of February 15, 2013, applications have increased to the point that law schools are now down a mere 18.9% in total applicants and 22% in total applications. A total of 39,351 people have applied to law school. If this pace continues, we would expect to see just short of 55,000 applicants this cycle. [Emphasis added.]

How Brian Leiter reads that:

So my earlier speculation has come true: there has been an uptick in applications this year.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Legaltech – The Power of a Crisis: Remaking the Habits of Lawyers

[Disclaimer: I am attending Legaltech thanks to a free blogger's pass, so read skeptically. All opinions are my own because nobody else would want them anyway.] [Further disclaimer: Live blogging. Errors, omissions, and snarky comments are my own.]

Day Three Keynote General Session Presentation: The Power of a Crisis: Remaking the Habits of Lawyers

The legal industry is at a crossroads. Some would call it a crisis, and many would attribute it to a series of habits developed over many years – like sticking with the billable hour, being slow to adopt new technologies, and continuing to buy legal services the old same way. In these tough economic times corporate clients are aggressively cutting costs and legal budgets are under the microscope in a way they never have been before. How can the legal industry – notoriously resistant to change – use the science of habit formation to change their ways and, ultimately, serve their clients better? Join us for a fascinating look at the neurology of habits – how they are created, reinforced, and controlled – and gain insight into how changing a few habits can transform an industry.

Speaker: Charles Duhigg,
Author, The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business;
Investigative Reporter, The New York Times

Look at two companies that have gone through significant changes: Alcoa and Starbucks.

Alcoa’s new CEO Paul O’Neill recognized that the aluminum industry was declining. He also recognized that producing aluminum was extremely dangerous to workers. He decided to focus not on productivity, but on developing habits around worker safety. Whenever an injury occurred, a factory boss had to write a lengthy report within 24 hours. What happened was that all the communication habits within Alcoa shifted. Result: revenues and profits exploded. “A crisis spilled into a habit of excellence.”

Does the legal industry face an “Alcoa moment”?

Case 2: Starbucks. We think of it as a company that sells coffee; it’s really a company that sells customer service. You can’t make people pay for customer service, but you can get them to pay for coffee. At the height of its expansion, Starbucks was hiring 1700 people per week–mostly high schoolers and recent high school grads. Problem: how to get kids to not act crazy? (NY TV news showed the story of a customer who complained because the employee wrote “Bitch,” instead of her name, on the coffee cup. Say goodbye to customer goodwill.) Problem, rephrased: how to get employees to develop willpower to provide good customer service. Consider the marshmallow study. Long story short, Starbucks revised their training manual to teach habits of willpower.

What does this mean for lawyers and law firms? During periods of crisis is when it’s easiest for individuals to change habits. So go out and do that. [That's where the talk ends.]

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Legaltech: The Future of Technology: Five Trends Lawyers Can’t Ignore

[Disclaimer: I am attending Legaltech thanks to a free blogger's pass, so read skeptically. All opinions are my own because nobody else would want them anyway.] [Further disclaimer: Live blogging. Errors, omissions, and snarky comments are my own.]

The Future of Technology: Five Trends Lawyers Can’t Ignore
Now more than ever, attorneys have an obligation to change with the times and stay on top of available technology that can help them better serve their clients and manage their practice. From shorthand to typewriters, Dictaphones to voice recognition software, technology always works its way into lawyers’ lives. Just as it has in the past, so will it in the future—and at a faster pace than many lawyers may be prepared for.

This session will introduce you to looming industry trends you can use to help your firm thrive in the ever-changing legal marketplace. We will also get you up to speed on the five top tech trends you can’t afford to ignore, including:

Evolving ABA & State Bar rules
Social Media
Predictive Coding
Alternative Fee Arrangements

Speakers:

Christopher T. Anderson,
Product Manager for the LexisNexis Firm Manager,
LexisNexis

Jack Halprin,
Head of eDiscovery, Enterprise,
Google

The cloud is not a brand new threat. Back in the day, operators could listen in on phone calls. What’s new is the speed, the amount of information, and the informality with which we now exchange information. When Chris and I started our law firms wouldn’t even let us have computers.

Still, lawyers’ “over-arching fear of the cloud” is noteworthy.
BYOD (bring your own device) is spreading.
iPhone & Android users vastly outnumber Blackberry users in the room.
Cost of storage is increasing, but cost of managing stored data is increasing.
We’re all on different electronic devices; it’s not all uniform any longer.

Mr. Anderson: It’s the clients, with changing expectations about how we work, who are driving changes in the practice of law–alternative billing, big data & e-discovery, transparency, etc.

Trend 1: Alternative fee arrangements (AFA)
We’re getting new technology & data that allow alternative fee arrangements to work for us. Some lawyers say the billable hour is a dinosaur–it’s dying.

Trend 2: Big Data & Electronic Discovery
Big data: “Collection of data sets so large and complex that it becomes awkward to work with.” Wikipedia. Impact: New FRCP Revisions effective Dec. 1–changing the way lawyers who practice in federal courts comply with e-discovery. Higher use of forensic specialists, e-discovery experts, data analysts.
E-discovery expertise is essential for most firms to compete in today’s market. More businesses are selecting legal representation based on RFP.
Technology assisted review (TAR) aka predictive coding. Not suitable for every case; with smaller document sets, it doesn’t work.
Predictive analytics & early case assessment (ECA)–estimating risk to prosecute or defend a legal case. Global organizations deal with legal discovery and disclosure requests for ESI and paper documents on a regular basis.

Trend 3: Client Expectations: The Age of Instant Information
Clients expect quick responses; we should have information at our fingertips. “It’s in the mail” is no longer acceptable. Cloud-based technologies help us to avoid the most common client complaint (not returning phone calls).

Trend 4: Social Media
The courts have almost universally held there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in social media. If it’s relevant info, or can lead to relevant info, it’s also discoverable.
Social media is being used as a business development tool. Ethical questions, such as whether you can “friend” a judge or an opposing client. You can’t describe yourself as an “expert” in your social media profiles.

Trend 5: Cloud Storage

Trend 6: Changing Business Models
Competition from above: Big Law is shedding lawyers.
Newly minted lawyers are not finding jobs.
Unbundling of legal services.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized